Monday, July 25, 2016
For international travel, my first choice is
Singapore Airlines. However I often book
Qatar Airlines, a close second in impeccable service, because of lower fares.
(I have heard that the Emirate is subsidizing the airline to build its prestige
and customer base.) Two demographics distinguish the cabin staffs of both
airlines. : they are predominantly
female and within the 25 to 35 year-old age bracket.
Service on my rare journeys by American Flag
carries – Delta, American and United fall well below the standard of Singapore
and Qatar. This saddens me since in the
1970s when I began an international travel regimen, Pan American and TWA, now
both defunct, were the world leaders.
Not only are staff members less proactive and efficient, but also
noticeably less cheerful. Many seem only
to be “putting in their time,” reluctantly fulfilling the obligations of a
career they no longer find rewarding. My own impressions have been confirmed by
friends and colleagues who, for various reasons must frequent American flag carriers for international
travel more regularly.
In addition to quality of service, what has
also distinguished the American Flag Carrer cabin staffs has been their
demographic: many are in their 30s, 40s
and, perhaps, even 50s. This had pointed
me towards two generalizations: (1)
cabin service ought to be a profession for the young; this is not a job that
women and men over age 35 find rewarding.
(2) American work-rules
forbidding “age discrimination” require airline managements to keep
lower-performing older staff members on the job.
A recent trip on British Airways, from Tampa to
London and London to Delft gave the lie to my generalizations. Cabin staff members were neither young nor
slim (they were predominantly, not exclusively, female). However they were not
only warmly welcoming but efficient. I would gladly choose British Airways
again and look forward to the journey, should the need arise.
What explains the disparity? Clearly it is neither the age or years of
service of cabin staff members. Rather,
I believe the explanation is high quality versus slovenly, and or indifferent and oppressive management
on the part of those who supervise them.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home